News
Ratings
Learn
Companies
Open Companies →
Who runs each service, how it works, where the risks are.All 30 companies A–Z →
About
New to crypto? Start here
Liquid Staking Protocols · OBOL rating

Stader review

Liquid staking across many chains with a permissionless operator pool on Ethereum, spread thinner than the single-chain specialists.

7.2/10
Solid
#8 of 15 liquid staking protocolsChecked August 2026
The short answer

Stader is the closest thing to a multi-chain liquid staking platform, and its Ethereum implementation borrows the right idea: bonded, permissionless node operators. Breadth costs depth — on each individual chain there is usually a larger, more liquid local alternative.

Best forMulti-chain liquid staking from one protocol

Score breakdown

Category rubric →
  1. Validator decentralisationweight 25%
    7.5avg 6.7
  2. Contract securityweight 20%
    7.0avg 7.9
  3. Peg & liquidityweight 20%
    6.5avg 7.1
  4. Withdrawal designweight 15%
    7.5avg 7.8
  5. Feesweight 10%
    7.5avg 7.4
  6. Transparencyweight 10%
    7.5avg 7.8

this service category average across 15Score = Σ mark × weight. Works well for a specific use case, weaker outside it. Methodology.

The evidence behind each mark

Scoring rules →
CriterionMarkWhat we foundSourceChecked
Validator decentralisation7.5not sourced yetnot sourced yet—
Contract security7.0not sourced yetnot sourced yet—
Peg & liquidity6.5not sourced yetnot sourced yet—
Withdrawal design7.5not sourced yetnot sourced yet—
Fees7.5not sourced yetnot sourced yet—
Transparency7.5not sourced yetnot sourced yet—

What we liked, and what fell short

Liked
  • Operates across Ethereum, Polygon, BNB Chain and others
  • Permissionless node operator pool with bonded collateral on ETHx
  • Reasonable audit coverage
Fell short
  • Liquidity per chain is limited compared with local leaders
  • Supporting many chains widens the contract surface considerably

Why the marks landed where they did

Most liquid staking protocols pick one chain and go deep. Stader went wide, deploying across Ethereum, Polygon, BNB Chain, Near and others, with a distinct liquid token on each.

The Ethereum implementation

ETHx uses a permissionless operator pool where node runners bond collateral, similar in principle to Rocket Pool though with different parameters and a lower bond requirement. That makes the operator set genuinely open, which is more than most competitors offer, and the lower bond broadens participation at some cost to the loss-absorption buffer.

The cost of breadth

Every additional chain is another set of contracts to audit, maintain and secure, and another liquidity pool to bootstrap. Stader's per-chain liquidity is modest, so on any given network there is usually a deeper local option — Lido or Rocket Pool on Ethereum, and the chain-native leader elsewhere.

Record

Audited across deployments with no major exploit, and withdrawals functioning on the main networks. Fee is around 10% of rewards.

Who should use it

Stakers wanting one interface across several chains, and Ethereum users specifically attracted to the permissionless operator model at a lower bond. For depth and liquidity on a single chain, use the local leader.

FAQ

Which chains does Stader support?
Ethereum, Polygon, BNB Chain, Near and others, each with its own liquid staking token.
Is ETHx permissionless?
Yes. Node operators bond collateral to join the pool, similar in principle to Rocket Pool with a lower bond requirement.
How liquid are Stader's tokens?
Modest on each chain compared with the local market leader, so exits at size are more expensive than with a dominant LST.
What does Stader charge?
Around 10% of staking rewards, in line with the category norm.