News
Ratings
Learn
Companies
Open Companies →
Who runs each service, how it works, where the risks are.All 30 companies A–Z →
About
New to crypto? Start here
Liquid Staking Protocols · OBOL rating

Rocket Pool review

The only major LST where anyone can become an operator, and the one that treats decentralisation as a constraint rather than a slogan.

8.7/10
Strong
#1 of 15 liquid staking protocolsChecked August 2026
The short answer

Rocket Pool is the liquid staking protocol that treats decentralisation as a constraint rather than a slogan: anyone can operate a node by posting ETH and RPL collateral, and rETH is redeemable permissionlessly. Holders pay for that in yield — the combined node commission and protocol fee is the highest among the majors.

Best forDecentralised Ethereum staking with permissionless operators

Score breakdown

Category rubric →
  1. Validator decentralisationweight 25%
    9.5avg 6.7
  2. Contract securityweight 20%
    9.0avg 7.9
  3. Peg & liquidityweight 20%
    8.0avg 7.1
  4. Withdrawal designweight 15%
    9.0avg 7.8
  5. Feesweight 10%
    6.5avg 7.4
  6. Transparencyweight 10%
    9.5avg 7.8

this service category average across 15Score = Σ mark × weight. Recommendable to most readers, with stated caveats. Methodology.

The evidence behind each mark

Scoring rules →
CriterionMarkWhat we foundSourceChecked
Validator decentralisation9.5not sourced yetnot sourced yet—
Contract security9.0not sourced yetnot sourced yet—
Peg & liquidity8.0not sourced yetnot sourced yet—
Withdrawal design9.0not sourced yetnot sourced yet—
Fees6.5not sourced yetnot sourced yet—
Transparency9.5not sourced yetnot sourced yet—

What we liked, and what fell short

Liked
  • Permissionless node operators with bonded RPL collateral
  • Long production record with no protocol exploit
  • Fully permissionless redemption of rETH
Fell short
  • Combined node and protocol fees leave a smaller net yield
  • Secondary liquidity is thinner than stETH's

Why the marks landed where they did

Every liquid staking protocol has to answer one question: who runs the validators. Lido answers with a curated operator set chosen by token governance. Coinbase answers with itself. Rocket Pool answers with anyone who posts collateral, which is the only answer that does not reintroduce a permissioned gatekeeper.

How the node economics work

Operators bond ETH alongside protocol-supplied ETH and post RPL as additional collateral. If they misbehave or are slashed, their bond absorbs the loss before rETH holders are affected. That skin-in-the-game structure is what makes permissionless operation safe, and it is why Rocket Pool can open validation to individuals without exposing depositors to unvetted operators.

What rETH costs and returns

The node operator takes a commission and the protocol takes a further cut, which together leave rETH holders with a lower net yield than stETH. In exchange, rETH accrues value against ETH rather than rebasing, which simplifies tax treatment in several jurisdictions and behaves better inside DeFi contracts.

Exit and liquidity

rETH can be redeemed permissionlessly through the protocol when the deposit pool has capacity, and traded on secondary markets otherwise. Depth is meaningfully thinner than stETH's, so exiting a large position quickly costs more.

Who should use it

Holders who weight Ethereum's decentralisation and are willing to accept slightly lower yield and thinner liquidity for it, and anyone wanting to run a validator with less than 32 ETH. For maximum liquidity and DeFi integration, stETH remains the practical choice.

FAQ

What is the difference between rETH and stETH?
rETH accrues value against ETH while stETH rebases in balance. More importantly, Rocket Pool's operators are permissionless and bonded, while Lido's are curated by governance.
Why is Rocket Pool's yield lower?
Node operators take a commission and the protocol takes a further fee, so more of the reward is distributed to the people running validators than in a pooled model with a single flat fee.
Can I run a Rocket Pool node?
Yes, by bonding ETH plus RPL collateral. That bond is what protects rETH holders if you are slashed, and it is why the operator set can be open.
How liquid is rETH?
Redeemable through the protocol when deposit pool capacity allows, and tradable on secondary markets — thinner than stETH, adequate for most position sizes.